General Information/Control of transposition activity: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Created page with "Transposition activity is generally maintained at a low level. An often cited reason for this is that high activities and the accompanying mutagenic effect of genome rearrange..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Transposition activity is generally maintained at a low level. An often cited reason for this is that high activities and the accompanying mutagenic effect of genome rearrangements would be detrimental to the host cell (see <ref> | == Control of transposition activity == | ||
Transposition activity is generally maintained at a low level. An often-cited reason for this is that high activities and the accompanying mutagenic effect of genome rearrangements would be detrimental to the host cell (see <ref>{{#pmid:6320009}}</ref>). Endogenous transposase promoters, in contrast to those assembled by the juxtaposition of -10 and -35 hexamers in those IS families whose transposition passes through a double-strand circular transposon intermediate, are generally weak and many are partially located in the terminal IRs. This would enable their autoregulation by Tpase binding. | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
{{Reflist|32em}} | |||
< | |||
== How to Cite? == | |||
TnPedia Team. (2025). TnPedia: General Information on Prokaryotic Elements. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15548171 | |||
[[File:General_Info-badge.png|link=https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15548171|DOI badge]]<hr> | |||
{{TnPedia}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:47, 30 May 2025
Control of transposition activity
Transposition activity is generally maintained at a low level. An often-cited reason for this is that high activities and the accompanying mutagenic effect of genome rearrangements would be detrimental to the host cell (see [1]). Endogenous transposase promoters, in contrast to those assembled by the juxtaposition of -10 and -35 hexamers in those IS families whose transposition passes through a double-strand circular transposon intermediate, are generally weak and many are partially located in the terminal IRs. This would enable their autoregulation by Tpase binding.
Bibliography
- ↑ Doolittle et al.. Selfish DNAs with self-restraint. Nature. 1984. 307. pp. 501-2. doi: 10.1038/307501b0. PMID: 6320009.
How to Cite?
TnPedia Team. (2025). TnPedia: General Information on Prokaryotic Elements. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15548171